June 1, 2017
The great thing about masternode voters is that you can be positive they are well-intentioned. As investors themselves, we can all rest assured that MNOs are voting in what they believe to be in the best interest of Dash. If a good proposal passes, the price of their investment rises and the utility of their favorite digital currency increases. However, sometimes a masternode voter might not always be the best judge of what proposal should pass. All too often, masternode voters are lead astray. We aim to change that.
If your best friend needed surgery, would you know where to cut? While things like integrations, software development features, and marketing proposals may seem simple on the surface, they are often very complex. Dash is lucky enough to have experts who have worked in these particular fields for many years and understand the complexities that go along with them. They can recognize value, fluff, and simply things that will or won't work. They might also see value in a proposal where it isn't so obvious on the surface.
If you are an expert in a particular field and would like to weigh in on a particular pre-proposal, current proposal, or the quality of product delivered on a past proposal, let us know
. DashTreasury.org is seeking volunteer proposal reviewers who would be willing to provide objective, articulate analysis on particular proposals. (Check out /r/DashTreasury for more discussion on this
Voting Deadline: 11 days
Payment date: Sep 2, 2017
Approved: 4 of 14